Moved component unit tests.

Engine/source/component/test/moreAdvancedComponentTest.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Copyright (c) 2014 GarageGames, LLC
+//
+// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
+// deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
+// rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
+// sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+//
+// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
+// all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+//
+// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+// FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
+// IN THE SOFTWARE.
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+#ifdef TORQUE_TESTS_ENABLED
+#include "testing/unitTesting.h"
+#include "component/moreAdvancedComponent.h"
+
+TEST(MoreAdvancedComponent, MoreAdvancedComponent)
+{
+   // Create component instances and compose them.
+   SimComponent *parentComponent = new SimComponent();
+   SimpleComponent *simpleComponent = new SimpleComponent();
+   MoreAdvancedComponent *moreAdvComponent = new MoreAdvancedComponent();
+   // CodeReview note that the interface pointer isn't initialized in a ctor
+   //  on the components, so it's bad memory against which you might
+   //  be checking in testDependentInterface [3/3/2007 justind]
+   parentComponent->addComponent( simpleComponent );
+   parentComponent->addComponent( moreAdvComponent );
+
+   simpleComponent->registerObject();
+   moreAdvComponent->registerObject();
+
+   // Put a break-point here, follow the onAdd call, and observe the order in
+   // which the SimComponent::onAdd function executes. You will see the interfaces
+   // get cached, and the dependent interface query being made.
+   parentComponent->registerObject();
+
+   // If the MoreAdvancedComponent found an interface, than the parentComponent
+   // should have returned true, from onAdd, and should therefore be registered
+   // properly with the Sim
+   EXPECT_TRUE( parentComponent->isProperlyAdded() )
+      << "Parent component not properly added!";
+
+   // Now lets test the interface. You can step through this, as well.
+   EXPECT_TRUE( moreAdvComponent->testDependentInterface() )
+      << "Dependent interface test failed.";
+
+   // CodeReview is there a reason we can't just delete the parentComponent here? [3/3/2007 justind]
+   //
+   // Clean up
+   parentComponent->removeComponent( simpleComponent );
+   parentComponent->removeComponent( moreAdvComponent );
+
+   parentComponent->deleteObject();
+   moreAdvComponent->deleteObject();
+   simpleComponent->deleteObject();
+};
+
+#endif